Hi, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: > El Martes, 24 de Noviembre de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió: >> Maybe "~= 100km", but "== 60 nm". > > Am I the only one who has read that as "60 nanometers"?
No, a certain Martin K. has already reported the same. I'd say it depends on context; nm is often, if sloppily, used in aviation at least, but since sub-meter precision isn't required there, nobody will misread it. Bye Frederik _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
