On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > > What if I map the entire section of grass which is within the right of > way as a polygon with highway=path, area=yes? That's how we represent > infinite overlapping criss-crossing "invisible-paths", like a > pedestrian mall.
Not bad. But what makes that area of grass a "path" as opposed to just an area of grass you can walk on (e.g. landuse=meadow or something + foot=yes)? Is there a difference? I tend to think "paths" should be limited to elongated areas, designed for or used typically for travel (other than for large vehicles like cars), with usually a constant or slowly varying width. There's probably a better definition though. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
