On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Roy Wallace wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Liz <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Roy Wallace wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Cartinus <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On Monday 30 November 2009 22:25:36 Roy Wallace wrote: > >> >> 1) I can convince you guys that this approach is the best way to get > >> >> global consistency, and that that's important; > >> >> 2) people realise that editors can be used to avoid additional > >> >> keystrokes and so there is actually no cost in adding foot=yes; > >> > > >> > I've been told that when OSM started (I wasn't involved then) that > >> > every motorway had to be tagged horse=no+foot=no+bicycle=no. > >> > > >> > There is a reason they stopped doing that. > >> > >> The reason is that that's *globally* redundant. > > > > not exactly correct. > > We do have highway marked motorway in Au where bicycles are allowed. > > Ok, rephrased: the reason they stopped is because it wasn't necessary. > Obviously, we have a problem here. I'm suggesting some solutions.
I'm not sure that those roads (Hume Highway) should be marked as motorway, but got no comment on the talk-au list when i asked for comments. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
