On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Interesting. I don't know if I agree with that or not. I certainly >> don't want to be involved in a project which encourages people to >> break the law, since encouraging people to break the law is in itself >> against the law where I live. > > If it helps you sleep better, presume that riding on a bike-prohibited > footpath actually means dismounting and walking with the bike :)
I can't actually think of a situation where we can't both be happy - something that maps reality in a way that lets renderers/routers choose for themselves what to do, without actively encouraging people to break the law. If a router wants to ignore bicycle=no, there's nothing we can do to stop them - the data is open source. Tagging a way with "surface=*, bicycle=no" should make everyone happy, right (assuming * is not "a surface which is perfect for mountain biking", anyway)? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
