On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Matt Amos <zerebub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> our choices are basically the following: > 1) continue to use a license which legal experts seem to agree doesn't > work for us. > 2) move to a new license. > > option (2) will likely mean that some data is lost and i don't think > option (1) is what people really want. which do you prefer? > I prefer 1. Of course, what works for you isn't the same as what works for me. I'm fine with everything being public domain. Why an open content project would try to place restrictions on the use of a collection of facts is beyond me.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
