Apollinaris Schoell schrieb: > On 5 Dec 2009, at 20:03 , Ulf Lamping wrote: > >> I'm sorry, but for the last two years I can't remember asking for a >> license change at all. > > Sorry but this topic was many times on many lists, it's on the wiki. If you > didn't care then why do you care now?
You may search this lists archive about comments I gave in the past. I have repeatedly asked for more openness and better inclusion of the community in such important topics such as a license change. For example the osmf-talk list was a result of complains I had in the past (at least it appeared after discussions on this list about the openness of the OSMF). Is it a requirement to be a member of the OSMF, regular taking part at the SOTM and/or actively taking part in the legal-talk list to raise my voice about things that are not well done IMHO? > Richard was the first to say thanks for all the work done bu the LWG and I > want to say that too. This is a very difficult task and it has to be done. > the new license and the transition is not perfect. But the question must be, > Is sticking to the old license better? In my opinion: yes. Simply because it is *known* by anyone interested. Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
