Frederik Ramm schrieb: > Hi, > > Your film example might fall in this category.
I provided the examples to explain that whatever license you choose, there will always be cases where the legal situation won't "feel right" for you. > The level where ODbL affords highest protection is that of a derived > database, which neither your film nor your atlas are, but if you > produced an interactive atlas on CD-ROM that renders maps on demand, > then that would have an underlying derived database, and ODbL would > require that you ODbL-license that underlying database and make it > available, on request, to buyers of your CD-ROM. Well, the publisher could simply argue that it has a collective database from several different databases (including his own), OSM only being one of them. Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
