Still does not appear on the mail OSM maps. Any clue on when is that likely to happen?
Regards, Shalabh On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Ulf Lamping <[email protected]>wrote: > Patrick Kilian schrieb: > > Hi all, >> >> Just to bring to the group's notice. I added a few mountain passes a >>>> couple of days ago along with the hiking trails and waypoints >>>> >>>> When I now check on OSM, while the trails are there along with the >>>> waypoints, the passes are missing. However, when I download data from OSM >>>> using JOSM, I can see the passes along with the elevations. >>>> >>>> Any clue whats the reason for not displaying on the renderer? >>>> >>> Except for JOSM, I currently don't know any renderer that displays >>> mountain_pass=yes at all (if there's any, please let us know :-) >>> >> >> As of revision 18423 osmarender (the renderer used by ti...@home) does >> too. It even renders name and ele(vation) if available. >> > > Ah, sounds reeaaallly coooool ;-) > > Any idea when this will appear on the main OSM maps? > > > Problem here: JOSM simply displays a bridge like icon, but doesn't care >>> about the direction (north, south, ...). >>> >> Osmarender does the same for single nodes... >> > > To my knowledge, most of the mountain_pass=yes are connected to some (at > least highway=path) ways. > > > A "correct renderer" should display a mountain pass somehow like a bridge >>> usually is displayed, following the direction of the way. >>> >> ... but aligns the icon along the way if the way is tagged with a track >> or highway tag. This is implemented with a wayMarker rule as mentioned >> by Dodi and uses a symbol very similar to the one mentioned by Ulfl. >> > > Sounds cool. Do you have an example on the map, where it already is > rendered this way? > > > As the mountain_pass is tagged as a node, it's unfortunately not that easy >>> to get that direction, so renderers simply tend to ignore this tag >>> completely :-( >>> >> Once a significant amount of the nodes without a way attached have a tag >> indicating direction I can add that to osmarender as well. >> > > My observation is that almost any mountain_pass=yes node is connected to > some kind of way, so I don't think this is very urgent. > > Regards, ULFL > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
