On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Nick Whitelegg < [email protected]> wrote:
> In any case, we are supposed to be open. Trying to trademark names merely > similar to our own is one of the most closed, monopolistic actions that > it's possible to take. The idea of OSM is to collect and make available > free data, not to act as a monopoly and go after similar projects. > > You're right; I didn't really think before posting. It was a tongue-in-cheek remark about the similarity of the URLs that came out wrong. Steve
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
