On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Anthony wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Liz <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Anthony wrote: > > > I suppose all > > > the bicyclists in OSM would disagree with that, but they don't have > > > much use for primary/secondary/tertiary designations either, do they? > > > > Of course we do, we want to avoid certain roads > > Which ones, and by what definitions of primary/secondary/tertiary?
We want to avoid roads with too much traffic. None of these maps are going to check for hills It doesn't matter whose definition of primary/secondary/tertiary because the object is ride on the lower grade roads having sent all the motorised traffic on the higher grade roads :) -- BOFH excuse #258: That's easy to fix, but I can't be bothered. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
