Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > +1, IMHO it should not be an option on the main map page as it is > less "open" than OSM. Instead we could have other projects there, > that are as open as OSM (and that preferably cover the whole > planet, don't know how much of those there are at the moment).
Right. When you've come up with a map that's as cartographically impressive, as technologically capable, and as downright _useful_ as OpenCycleMap, come back and ask again, won't you? To me the front page of OSM seems like the ideal place to demonstrate "look, this is what having open data enables you to do". But, hey, maybe fundamentalism is the in thing for 2010. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Not-properly-Open-but-called-Open-%28was%3A-Re%3A--Talk-GB--Yet-another-trunk-road-query---A495%29-tp26989214p26995050.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
