2010/1/2 Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 10:14:41PM +1000, John Smith wrote: > > Hmmm perhaps I should have been a little clearer, I'm thinking of > > administrative boundaries, in particular boundary relations, and there > > is lots of area names rendering in the middle of no where or duplicate > > names close to each other because there is a boundary + a place node, >
probably that's a mapping error? If there's a polygon the node could go. Or it could be added to a relation, where the node would be inserted as rendering-location-suggestion? This still might be different for different views and zooms. > Doesnt make sense - its just matter of fixing the mapnik config. I > think currently it renders a name for all polygons. This should > probably be limited to certain types. > well, I myself consider rendering all polygon-names a feature (nice to see which features are maybe missing in the stylesheet), but for a "clean map for the consumer" I'd agree with you (though I don't consider Mapnik-OSM as such). cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
