On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd suggest that if and when there is a "more open" OCM, then you might > argue to replace Andy's one with it. I don't see a point in shooting > ourselves in the foot before then. > Do you see the point in building OSM in the first place? As I said, I don't think it's shooting ourselves in the foot. I see it as using a crutch when we're perfectly capable of walking on our own. It's a judgment call, but I think the long-term benefits to the project of telling Andy "thanks but no thanks" outweigh the short-term advantages.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
