Am 16.01.2010 um 20:06 schrieb Frederik Ramm: > Hi, > > Frédéric Bonifas wrote: >> If there is a better method, then the only thing to do is to revert >> the changeset 3632884 : >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3632884 > > This import does not meet normal OSM import quality standards and under > normal circumstances I would probably revert it until someone has the > time & diligence to do it properly. (The boundaries do not re-use the > existing coastline but instead duplicate it in a rough form; where tho > administrative areas meet, ways are not re-used either but duplicated.) > > Usually, while we apply the rule "better crappy data than no data at > all" for anything surveyed by humans, we are more strict with imports, > and we ask people to either do it right or leave it for someone who can. > > But of course this is an exceptional situation in that many people seem > to be using the map data *now* rather than some time later when we had > the time to polish it, so it was probably good to import the data, buggy > as it is.
I agree. If you can provide a better import, why not just do it (may take some time of course) and revert the old import then? Jonas _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
