So, you are saying that the post-earthquake photographs show the buildings 50 meters from where the pre-earthquake photographs show them, but there is no difference in the location or appearance of the terrain? Unless the buildings in question are on wheels, and might have rolled to their new location, it seems unlikely that a landslide strong enough to displace buildings by 50 meters would leave no visible traces other than displaced buildings.
------Original Message------ From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen To: Marcus Wolschon To: John Eldredge Cc: [email protected] Cc: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Intriguing artifacts in GeoEye data Sent: Jan 18, 2010 3:01 PM This IS a picture ! Not drawn ! It coincides with a aftershock location Gert -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Marcus Wolschon [mailto:[email protected]] Verzonden: maandag 18 januari 2010 21:56 Aan: [email protected] CC: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen; [email protected]; OpenStreetMap talk mailing list Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Intriguing artifacts in GeoEye data Sounds like buildings drawn precisely from high-res but poorly georeferences aerial photos. Looking at a sat-image you don´t know if not all of that photo is 50 or 200 meters off unless you are on the ground to compare. On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:51 PM, John F. Eldredge <[email protected]> wrote: > If only man-made artifacts are displaced, but not the terrain, that must be a > mapping error. An actual earthquake land-shift would have displaced the > terrain, and moved buildings and other artifacts along with the land. -- John F. Eldredge -- [email protected] "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
