I think that areas that share nodes with other areas and especially with ordinary roads, create a lot of extra work when something has to be edited. I think that every object should stand on it's own, and if there is a relation between the two, well, eh , use a relation.
Gert Gremmen ----------------------------------------------------- Openstreetmap.nl (alias: cetest) Before printing, think about the environment. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens [email protected] Verzonden: Thursday, February 11, 2010 5:32 AM Aan: [email protected] Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Two different ways with the same nodes? > Hello, > > Is it allowed (or intended) that two different ways share the same > edges? For example: > there are nodes a, b, c and two ways A, B with: > A = (a, b, c) > B = (c, b, a) > > While loading some osm data in a database i realized that there are some > ways with this "problem", so > is this a correct feauture or a mapping error? > absolutely correct For example where an admin boundary follows the coast one way for the coast one way for the admin boundary if we have joined ways we are getting renderer problems so the au mob have decided to maintain duplicate ways in those circumstances. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
