Yes, we have adapted that. Cédric On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Emilie Laffray <emilie.laff...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > On 30 March 2010 16:13, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote: > >> 2010/3/30 Cédric MOULLET <cedric.moul...@gmail.com>: >> > Hi, >> > It's not Cédric's project, but the project of a community (composed of >> > individuals, companies and universities) initiated in 2007 ;-) (see >> press >> > release: >> > >> http://code.google.com/p/openaddresses/wiki/Release_BETA_PressRelease#EN:_OpenAddresses_.org,_a_community_web_site_for_the_management >> ). >> > But, I still can answer. >> >> Dear Cédric, >> >> OpenAdresses is an interesting idea as a simpler interface for address >> data. The intent to synchronize the data with OSM makes sense. >> >> The current situation with OSM data cc-by-sa and OpenAddresses data >> cc-by seems broken. Shouldn't the licenses be synchronized so that >> the data can be synchronized? >> >> OpenAddresses is failing the share-alike obligation. Do you >> understand that some will see that as a serious problem. This issue >> will persist when OSM upgrades to the ODbL license. >> >> Can you bring this problem to the attention of the OpenAddresses >> community and resolve it? >> >> > Hello, > > Cedric has replied on the French mailing list. He is aware of the licence > issue and he is going to be changing the licence to be compatible with OSM. > I am sure it will happen very soon as he is very responsive. > > Emilie Laffray > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > -- Welcome to my world: http://www.cedricmoullet.com/ My Linked In profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cedricmoullet Twitter: http://twitter.com/cedricmoullet
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk