On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:04:23 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Having a "bot flag" would be good for a number of reasons but your > problem would not be solved by that. In my opinion this is not something > we can do in the API (personally I think the "history" tab on the web > page was a big mistake, I would never have put it there). But it could > be done on a third party site. Why not implement it? > > A little better coding quality on the bot programmers' side would also > help. It would not be too hard to split up their changes so as to not > create changesets spanning 100s of square kilometres.
As I'm not a programmer and can't help in implementing this feature in any third party site I can only try to speak with bot programmers and ask if it is possible not to span so vast areas. Thank you for your answer. ps. it is a pitty that its not possible to implement bot flag :( -- pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt blog: http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com linux, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless, ronjenje, pametne kuće registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: [email protected] _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
