On 05/13/2010 06:12 PM, Gregory wrote:


On 13 May 2010 16:46, SteveC <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    this could be a good SOTM talk too?

+1

But aren't we in the 'process' of changing the OSMF logo?
I think it's really important the two logos both share elements. A lot of OSMF logo entries seemed to ignore the OSM logo and so lost support from me, but perhaps, possibly, we need to be looking at redesigning both logos TOGETHER.


I noticed that over half a year ago, but then found out it was just about the OpenStreetMap Foundation, not the project as a whole. So I didn't contribute there.

"the great project is misrepresented by a bloated and indistinct clipart"
Erm, I think that's what your logo proposal does/is. It looks like a clipart just for 'map' and maybe 'marker'. The current logo is representing that it is not just about the map, but the data you see behind it (the 0s and 1s).


in my eyes that is a clipart:
http://images.clipartof.com/small/17470-Clipart-Picture-Of-A-Star-Mascot-Cartoon-Character-With-Open-Arms.jpg

and that is a logo:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/48/Mercedes-Benz_logo.svg

I think there is a vast difference. A logo does not need to tell stories... inside itself.

--
Gregory
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.livingwithdragons.com

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to