On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > "If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include that > information in a work, you will own that work, and may distribute it to > others under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike (CC-BY-SA) licence." > So make sure you add them in the source, and I guess we're assuming that's > enough attribution.
Adding them to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution seems like a good idea, but I see a potential problem. Have any of the au community who are so enthusiastically using nearmap as a source considered the effect of the OSM license upgrade to ODbL? Will all nearmap-sourced data have to be reverted / removed? Or has the au community approached nearmap and received their written consent to relicense data derived from their images as ODbL? I see that they mention OpenStreetMapS <-- that terminal "s" again, most-common typo, ever! in their terms of use, and they certainly seem pretty awesome all around. But what's up with the license upgrade? Best regards, Richard _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
