On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Serge Wroclawski <emac...@gmail.com> wrote: > My suggestions: > > 1) Please reword the list to not have judgemental label on it. "just the > facts"
i've removed the list. it was intended as a bit of fun, certainly not to offend anyone and i honestly didn't expect anyone who wasn't doing bulk imports to end up on the villains list. by way of explanation, "villain" is a kind of old-fashioned word in modern british usage - i definitely didn't mean criminal. apologies to anyone who was offended. > 2) Explain the algorithm. Are you looking for duplicated nodes > litterally by "nodes which are on top of one another" or something > more loose? it's as simple as two nodes having exactly the same lat/lon, as explained on these pages: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Duplicate_nodes_map http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/dupe_nodes/about.html#wtf > 3) For those of us who have duplicated nodes still around, make it > easy to download the list and examine it. You're already compiling the > data- just make it available as an OSM file for us to look at in our > favorite OSM editor, please. the whole thing is offline right now anyway, but when i get it back online i'll add your suggestion to the TODO list. it's unlikely to be a downloadable file (kinda the whole point was that it should be minutely-up-to-date), but something like a map call should be possible. or to hook it into a larger OSM bug-tracking system like OSB if it's able to handle the millions of points... cheers, matt _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
