John F. Eldredge wrote: >>From: Nathan Edgars II >>In other words, if we know for sure that Long Street is officially the A1889, >>it might make sense as a separate ref_unmarked=A1889 tag, like old_ref=A1, >>but using the same tagging for signed and unsigned routes helps nobody. >It is not unusual for roads to have signage for both the local name and also >an official route name (sometimes multiple route names). Definitely. I'm talking about the case where A1889 appears on no signs; it is simply an internal designation used by the highway agency. Here's a real-life example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_595_(Maryland)
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
