On the Greater Victoria Cycling Coalitions (copyrighted :-( Map) they list 'busy' intersections that requre the cyclist to 'blender with fast traffic' as adiquate infrastructure doesnt exist.
They use a yellow circle around the intersection. However, in sometowns, EVERY intersection that doesnt have a 'cyclist advance green' would potentially make cyclists become 'smooth'. So it gets a 'red light' by me. HOWEVER, by detailing the map more with the 'LCN' and listing all cycle lanes. The 'danger zones' can be extrapolated. (doesnt have bike lanes & isnt part of a local cycling infracture.. On another note, (same map) double cheverons 'V's indicating super steep, and single for smooth steep, might be an option :-) On 6/20/10, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20 June 2010 21:19, Ed Avis <[email protected]> wrote: >> It might be better to tag all the roads which are known to be good and >> safe >> for cyclists to use. Perhaps cycle=recommended might be a good tag. > > Black and white rarely exist in the real world, you'd need some kind > of scale so routing software can choose better paths than others... > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- Twitter: @Acrosscanada Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans Skype: samvekemans IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) @Acrosscanadatrails _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
