M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/6/23 Anthony <[email protected]>:
>
>> The alternative would be to have three different ways.
>> Neither solution is particularly nice, though. I'm actually hoping someone
>> will come up with something better :).
>>
>
>
> use three ways and connect them with area relations ;-)
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
>
Now that I think of it, I wonder about the right way to represent
the traffic network in the Netherlands, where a single roadway might
have a tram track, lanes for cars, bicycle paths, a sidewalk, a
canal, and probably some other things too, all exquisitely threaded
through intersections.
Of course, land use policy in polderized areas is more like land
use policy on a space colony than it is like in most places on Earth.
Intercity bicycle paths in the sector NW of Amsterdam (that I'm a
little familiar with) look pretty good on the "Cycle Map" but I notice
there are some nice recreational areas that don't show up on the "Cycle
Map" that would be good destinations for tourists lucky enough to rent a
bike there.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
