There has been a slightly disturbing thread on the legal-talk list about defining critical mass, so far things aren't any closer to being defined and statistics are being abused to suit positions:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-July/003453.html At this stage I'll not be agreeing to ODBL, not because I disagree with the license, but because I disagree with the process being used. Without some better criteria being employed to make the process less subjective and prone to personal bias it will be as 80n put it, a simple wait game until things go their way, I don't think this is the right thing to do, it's a kind of sleazy politicking tactic to achieve an unfavourable result desired by a minority... _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
