On 19 July 2010 22:02, Ed Avis <[email protected]> wrote: > they can get away with) think twice before appropriating OSM data, what is the > evidence for the claim that the current licence is broken?
I think SteveC mentioned Nike, but how's that different from someone in breach of GPL, didn't anyone talk to Nike and/or pursue this issue further, because as far as I'm concerned the only "proof" that matters that the current license is broken would be a judgment/precedent against OSM(F). However as Anthony pointed out, it's unlikely most major companies would take things that far because then they risk having that precedent used against them by their competitors... _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
