I take back my earlier comments, apparently it is ok to have it behind a link. Another website you might know also has it like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/
If you could also fix the StreetMap and OpenStreetMaps texts this website will be a excellent addition to OSM. Greetings, Floris Looijesteijn Ãvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 08:53, Ben Last <[email protected]> wrote: >> "should typically" != "must" :) >> >> But the key point is that we attribute OSM with the same prominence as >> we do any other supplier.  You'll note that there is no copyright >> message relating to the photomaps on the main page (for us, or any >> supplier). > > I find this attribution to be completely reasonable. The Legal FAQ is > just a FAQ, but the only thing that applies in the CC-BY-SA, which > just includes clauses like "reasonable to the medium". > > Map -> Information -> Copyrights and credits is no different than e.g.: > > 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap > 2. File -> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cambridge-Openstreetmap-08-06-13.svg > 3. Look at "Permission". > > Having a floating OpenLayers attribution element in the lower right > corner is one way to do it, but it's not the only way, and people that > don't pick that particular way aren't doing anything wrong as far as I > can tell. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
