80n wrote:
Isn't it going to present some complicated management problems if the LWG changes the contributor terms at this stage in the process?
No, not in this case. The proposal is a subset of the powers currently available to OSMF, not a superset. It is the existing CT _minus_ the option of future relicensing (with a clarification on asserting rights in any derivative database combined entirely of contributions by PD users).
Therefore OSMF need not treat the two groups separately as long as it does not exert the future licence change option for the 30,000 'CT 1.0' signups.
cheers Richard _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
