Hi,
Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Matt Amos <[email protected]> wrote:
OSMF is not moving to "a PD license disguised as BY-SA"
Then why don't they ever talk about the fact that the contents are
going to be released under DbCL?
Because it is irrelevant given that the Database as a whole is
protected, rather than the individual pieces it contains which, as you
correctly state, are largely unprotectable anway?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
