On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:06:00 +0100, 80n <[email protected]> wrote: > Why don't you try this. Import some Ordnance Survey Street View data > into > OSM, then render it as a Produced Work with the ODbL required > attribution: > > "Contains information from OpenStreetMap, which is made available here > under the Open Database License (ODbL)." > > Now take that rendered map and wave it under the noses of the nice people > at > Orndance Survey and see how long it takes them to sue you for not > complying > with their attribution clause.
Why don't you try this. Import some Ordnance Survey Street View data into OSM, then render it as a Produced work with the _current_ OpenStreetMap recommended attribution: "Map data (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA" Now take that rendered map and wave it under the noses of the nice people at Ordnance Survey and see how long it takes them to sue you for not complying with their attribution clause (or at least send you a stern lawyer's letter). I'm not the first to say this, but is the problem not (whichever BY-SA licence we use) that we are suggesting to people that attributing the project is enough (rather than, say, giving the most major contributors to the map area individual attribution). I don't know; IANAL. David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
