2010/8/11 Grant Slater <[email protected]> > Just gone through your ticket. The data working group (DWG) has not > met for a very long time. The DWG is not a very sexy working group to > be a member of, and I know for me many other things have been taking > higher priority of my limited free time. (I am also a member of ...
Even if open read-only access to the tracking system of DWG, apparently it exists, because I can not believe that the hand written Frederik ticket id. Then, even though everyone will understand that DWG currently is not working. Or vice versa works. We can go ahead and try to work out some approximate criteria upon which you can delegate some work to other people who I'm sure there are. Maybe it will local chapters or someone else. Now it is clear that no one wants to be a black box - it's not sexy. I think for the same reason, the recent story with Juergenian [http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2010-July/thread.html#51745] continued for almost a week, though, imho, the work was there for half an hour maximum. And this again was in the format mail list, but not DWG. However, I do not want to accuse of inaction Frederik or Grant. These people have done and are doing too much for the project. Otherwise, I seem rather strange discussions and processes arround the new license, because it is unclear how often the observed current license. And what are the mechanisms to bring the desired to reality. But now I do not know what I can do. So I can technically use the revert-tools in order to undo edits. I think that I can provide "ACT RESPONSIBLY" for the rollback to the local community, but I think this is not the right way. So can I write a few tickets, but apparently now it will not change anything. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
