Am 13.08.2010 23:09, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
The problem is: The system is there to balance your right to say
something and the receiver's right to not be bothered by what you have
to say.
Someone who is interested in legal topics is invited to join legal-talk.
Someone who isn't should not have to deal with legal topics, no matter
how important the author thought they would be.
Oh, yes, I see.
Someone who is proposing the change is allowed to use every possible way
to announce the change: announce ML, a wiki banner, ...
Someone who is opposing that change should shut up on any other way than
legal-talk.
Unless there's a balanced approach to represent both pros and cons of
the license change, every attempt to push related talk to legal-talk ML
*is* in fact censorship.
Regards, ULFL
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
