Pieren <pieren3 <at> gmail.com> writes: > > It seems that culvert=yes is ambiguous. It can be a ford or applied on the road. I'm also in favour to replace culvert=yes by tunnel=culvert, bridge=culvert or ford=culvertIt has also the advantage of simplifying the tag management in applications (can just handle tunnel=* or bridge=* or ford=*). > Pieren
And it can also be considered how ofter culvert is needed. Normally, if a ditchcrosses a way it does it through a culvert, at least here in Finland, and everybody knows it without splitting the waterway and adding culverts or layer definitions etc. But for sure there are culverts which are worth having their own tags. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
