On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 23:44 +0100, Grant Slater wrote: > PLEASE... > Follow ups on legal-talk list. Thread started here: > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-August/004221.html
Ahhhh, maybe this explains why it seems like Ive missed huge chunks of this licence discussion. Like a lot of OSMers, Im only subscribed to talk@ and talk-au@ for my country specific things. What other lists do we have to join to be involved in these discussions that affect our project? The only way Ive even been partly kept up-to-date (since im not on legal-talk) is when people post to this list, shortly before their threads get shutdown, after everyone else who apparently isnt on legal-talk wonders why theyre being ignored and not being kept up-to-date with the process. I suspect Im not the only mapper who has put their mapping activities on-hold until these discussions can be figured out, and I know exactly how you plan on controlling my contributed information. Surely its not in the interests of OSM to keep fobbing off contributors, telling them theyre worthless, and if they want any input into the project theyre a part of, they need to learn legalese and have it out with the wanna-be lawyers. Why cant we all just get along? David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
