John Harvey <j...@johnharveyphoto.com> wrote: > OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a > more modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report > myself - very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but > functional to get a breakdown of tag usage. I figured someone else > might like to read it too:
In cas you don't know it, there is tagstat, a little bit slow but more accurate and with updated data : <http://tagstat.hypercube.telascience.org/> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagstat> I usually prefer it over osmdoc because it use updated data. -- Pierre-Alain Dorange _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk