Did you read the minutes where all the CT issues are being discussed? Have fun,
Steve | stevecoast.com On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:03 AM, Simon Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:39:11PM +0100, Rob Myers wrote: >> On 09/02/2010 11:24 AM, TimSC wrote: > >>> 1) How is the future direction of OSM determined? Community consensus? >>> OSMF committees with OSMF votes? Something else? >> >> Consensus decision making doesn't mean a 100% plebiscite vote or >> minority veto power. It means an honest attempt to converge on a >> compromise. Given this, the ODbL does represent community consensus. >> It represents a compromise between many different ideological >> positions present in the community around the norms that have >> emerged in discussion over the years. > > I don’t see much compromise happening from OSMF on the contributor > terms. There is a very small amount, but OSMF seems to want to stick as > close to what they have, with no chance of what they consider a > significant change. > > The contributor terms are now the sticking point for many people against > the ODbL+DbCL+CT combination, and these are not just people against a > licence change from CC by-sa, but people who are in principle happy with > the licence change. > > These contributor terms define a large part of how the future direction > of OSM may be determined. > > Simon > -- > A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a > simple system that works.—John Gall > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
