On 22 September 2010 02:38, Peter Wendorff <[email protected]> wrote: > I would say, it's NOT an error to not map the access tags itself - sometimes > the mapper don't know this facts - as mentioned in this thread before. > But I totally agree, that it's a mandatory tag to be sure at usage, so it > should be displayed as error in error tracking software (keep right etc.), > and mentioned as a warning (or kind of soft error) in editor software (like > the josm validator).
I've been doing what others do, tagging the access on the other side of the barrier, not the barrier itself, and a missing access tag usually means there is no access limitations. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
