On 29 September 2010 18:15, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Grant Slater > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes our legal council believes CT/ODbL is compatible. The lawyer did >> supply a breakdown and reasoning why he believes it is compatible. BUT >> the Contributor Terms are currently being revised and will need >> further review. I cannot release their breakdown and reasoning without >> their blessing, as you know the lawyer represents OSMF. > > Having seen the argument as to why CC-BY-SA produced works are > compatible with CT/ODbL, I bet I can guess... The argument goes > something like 1) Geodata isn't protectable. 2) OS is geodata. 3) > Therefore OS is compatible with CT/ODbL. >
Which argument would that be? I haven't seen it. OS OpenData License is not the CC-BY-SA. As stated in another thread OS OpenData is an attribution license and specifically allows sub-licensing. Regards Grant _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
