On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Jukka Rahkonen <[email protected] > wrote:
> Ed Avis <e...@...> writes: > > > What I meant to say was: under these contributor terms, OSM is not > compatible > > with itself! Although the OSM project licenses its data under CC-BY-SA > > or under ODbL, it would not accept such licences from others. > > > > Whether this really matters, or is just an obscure point of principle, is > open > > to debate. But it's certainly the case. > > It is hard to believe that we want to build such a system but if that is > the case then it will matter once someone takes some OSM data and lets own > users to do updates and inserts. Isn't for example OpenAddresses such a > project? > Yes, the automatic right to re-incorporate changes/additions made in produced works is a major flaw in the whole proposal.
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
