On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:32:32 +0200 Ulf Lamping <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm very much in favour of adopting such a policy. At the very > > least, we can then stop debating whether or not we need such > > policies, and whether or not people's behaviour is harmful - we can > > simply discuss whether they are in line with the policy or not. > > And who will decide that? ;-) > And who will decide to change the policy "just in case"? ;-) When you have a set of standards you define the standards you define the penalties you set up accreditors you set up an arbitrator accreditors compare [whatever] against the standards arbitrator makes a final decision penalties or rewards are applied Now, as this is talk, we can talk for the next 12 months about standards, penalties, who is in group a and who is in group b. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
