On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Simon Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:18:41PM +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> 2010/11/16 David Murn <[email protected]>: >> >> > Maybe I missed something, but when were the decisions made? >> >> >> back in 2008 > > The decisions had to be “the current licence is not suitable, we should > find something more suitable” rather than any specific instances of the > ODbL and CTs which were developed much later.
I remember hearing about the ODbL in 2007, its final version was published in 2008 and the motion to adopt it was made in 2008. The CT is a separate issue, and that was only ratified in (I believe) 2010 in its current form. IMHO the CT is the more vital of the two documents for the long term success of the project. - Serge _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
