Ed Avis wrote: > It's curious that two of the strongest defences of 'strong share-alike' > come > from yourself and Richard F. - but both of you prefer public domain. I, > too, would prefer public domain over the ODbL. What's going on? > Shouldn't we stop adding more legalese and just focus on transitioning > OSM to PD or attribution-only?
Good luck with that, as the phrase goes. :( Basically, OSM has several outspoken people who won't countenance a permissive licence (e.g. Etienne and Steve). If you'd like to try and convince them of the error of their ways you're a braver man than I am. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Best-license-for-future-tiles-tp5747363p5762573.html Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
