Anthony schrieb:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Francis Davey<[email protected]> wrote:
On 12 December 2010 14:08, Robert Kaiser<[email protected]> wrote:
If "67%" is not clear in legalese, then legalese is stupid, IMHO. Let's
abolish all legal rules and make contributing fun instead, then.
There's no such thing as "legalese" as I've said before. The CT's
don't say "67%" they say "2/3", which is completely clear. The phrase
"at least a 2/3 majority vote" has a pretty clear and unambiguous
meaning.
It's not clear what the denominator is supposed to be.
2/3 of me are still trying to understand you, the rest are yelling "he's
crazy!" - can you clarify what you mean?
Robert Kaiser
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
