On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:25:05 +0100 Simone Cortesi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:00, Stephen Hope <[email protected]> wrote: > > I must admit, however, that basically handing the keys to the OSMF, > > which is what the new CT's amount to, is not filling me with joy > > considering their track record to date. I'm willing to do a certain > > amount of work to make sure the data I've provided over the years > > isn't lost, but if they jerk me around too much or make it too hard > > I'll just write it off as a loss and spend my free time somewhere > > it's appreciated. > > this is no way different from GPL released software: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html > GPL may be either way - all code contributed to a project is copyrighted to the project, or copyright remaining with the author. Just to check the Linux Kernel where both types are represented http://www.kernel.org/legal.html Copyright 1997-2007 The Linux Kernel Organization, Inc. Distributed software is copyrighted by their respective contributors and are distributed under their own individual licenses. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
