David Murn wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 10:18 -0800, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> >> Let those broken routers choke on real-world cases where nodes really are >> in >> the same place (double-decker bridge that crosses a state line, for >> example). I'll continue to map correctly. > > Just because you have ways crossing each other at a common point, that > doesnt mean they all have to have a node at the same point. When youre > putting a bridge over a creek, do you simply mark the start/end of the > bridge, or do you also put a node in the middle of the bridge above the > water? Just because a double-decker bridge crosses a border or river, > doesnt mean that each layer needs to have a node at exactly the same > point, unless youre either using low-accuracy GPS data, or delibrately > trying to make the map data harder to interpret by routers. > If the name or ref is different on either side of the state line, then it needs to be split in the middle. -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Postmortem-analysys-tp5899422p5903544.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
