The word you want is deprecate, not depreciate. Depreciate means "to go down in monetary value".
-------Original Email------- Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my >From :mailto:[email protected] Date :Fri Jan 14 03:43:26 America/Chicago 2011 On 14 January 2011 19:24, NopMap <[email protected]> wrote: > No. I am making the assertion that the most important problems cannot be > solved by mass retagging, thus contradicting JohnSmittys earlier statement > that the "lack of a mass retagging policy was the weakness" rather than the > lack of an approval process. And you completely missed my original comment then, not only is a policy needed on how to depreciate existing tags, such as the flow control thread was talking about combining various things that control the flow of water with some additional new tags, but you also need to be able to depreciate existing tags, give people advance notice of the change, dual tag if possible and finally be able to mass retag in the database. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- John F. Eldredge -- [email protected] "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
