At 01:10 AM 17/01/2011, Anthony wrote: >https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1sC0SrG_R6OkRDdC3IJKlmDEn2pYTY2DZfcpSLFdiBBU
Latest and greatest: https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1jY58fD3JyNUjzmecrpNejoOt4OnfHeEM-6o8rD5hCLY >"You are indicating that, as far as You know, You have the right to >authorize OSMF to use and distribute those Contents under our current >licence terms." > >What are the "current license terms"? Right now it means, what, >CC-BY-SA? Yes. Though I hope most folks will have the common sense to take into account a license change. >And after the CC-BY-SA content is removed it means ODbL and >DbCL? It means ODbL and DbCL once we have formally changed from CC-BY-SA. >At what point, if any, does the database become one where OSMF can't >switch back to CC-BY-SA without removing data? If 2/3 of active contributors vote for CC-BY-SA then OSMF can switch to it. If there was some data in there that somehow could be distributed under ODbL but not under CC-BY-SA, then it would either have to be removed or the IP owners contacted for permission. Mike _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
