Stephan Knauss wrote: > I'm not a lawyer, but the current TOU seam not to allow it to be used > in our editors.
My understanding of this Bing term is that it's _intended_ to mean "not available for use in an editor that is only available under commercial terms", e.g. the ArcGIS plugin. I agree there's ambiguity there and clearing up the NC terms was one of the suggestions I made for clarifying the licence (suggestions which are currently with OSMF on the way to Bing, I believe). > Potlatch (2) is GPL. That is not non-commercial. No it fricking isn't GPL! Potlatch 2 is proudly WTFPL: http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/potlatch2/LICENCE.txt cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/magical-road-detector-tp5993637p5998722.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
