I am of exactly the same mind of NEII on this. When the OSMF holds the gun to my head, I will eventually Accept. Until then, I'd like to keep my 'data vote' opposed in order to slow down the impending train wreck as long as possible.
My contributions aren't as numerous as his <http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?NE2>, but if removed they would set my area back a half-decade. If NEII's (and others) are removed, we can add the United States to Australia as 'countries the OSMF is willing to sacrifice.' Alex On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]>wrote: > > Dermot McNally wrote: > > > > I applaud your ethics, but it seems to me that your chosen course of > > action, unless you do intend to accept at a later stage for your > > existing account, > > > I do, if we get to the point where we are removing data. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OpenStreetMap-License-Change-Phase-3-Pre-Announcement-tp6266295p6273980.html > Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
