On 15 April 2011 00:08, David Murn <[email protected]> wrote: > So, please feel free to tell me where I invented anything?
Right here: "What he is voting against, is OSMF using previously created data which is not practical to split the 'clean' from 'tainted'." As quoted in my earlier mail. Nothing in Nathan's mails suggested that practicalities or tainted data have any bearing on his decision. That is what you have invented - it might indeed be _your_ reason for voting against, and I would certainly have to respect that. But please stick to facts, this process is complicated enough as it is. Indeed, the last comment on this page indicates that tainted data are certainly not a feature of Nathan's contributions: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NE2 Dermot -- -------------------------------------- Igaühel on siin oma laul ja ma oma ei leiagi üles _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
